| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Barber v. Thomas ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Barber v. Thomas
''Barber v. Thomas'', 560 U.S. 474 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. It concerned how the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons should calculate "good time credits", reduced sentences for inmates who stayed out of trouble while in custody.〔(Supreme Court justices have a good time debating 'good time' )〕
==Background==
The petitioner, Michael Barber, sought ''habeas corpus'' in a federal district court. He argued that the Bureau of Prisons "inaccurately calculated his good time credit toward the service of his federal sentence." Barber argued that the BOP should have calculated good time credit based on the sentence imposed rather than the time actually served in prison. Barbers petition was denied by the district court, on appeal the Ninth Circuit affirmed the ruling of the lower courts citing ''Tablada v. Daniels'' noting that the good time credit statute was ambiguous and the BOP's interpretation was reasonable.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2009/2009_09_5201 )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Barber v. Thomas」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|